I cannot digest this sentence itself….believing it is impossible.
SALMAN in jail. Who will be in the next part of the series DABANGG…!! Well I cannot imagine any other actor taking his position. Its Salman and the love of his fans that make his movies cross most of the times the 100 crore mark. Is his role, his entertaining act that make people laugh, cry and smile when he does the same?
Fans are not created overnight, nor the fan-following. There is obviously lot of efforts, lot of hard work, lot of struggle, lot of practice that has helped him to reach this position today where his fans are praying for him. And yes, how can I miss his marriage! Well, it’s still a suspense whether SALMAN KHAN will marry or remain single throughout his life. And if he does marry, who that lucky girl will be.
The fact that “In 2004 Khan was ranked as 7th Best looking man in world - People Magazine, USA.”, itself tells the reason why the number of girls in his fans list is greater than the men. The other fact “He has a 42-inch chest, 17-inch biceps and a 30-inch waist. - from Wikipedia” also explains why this number is balanced by the number of male-fans. In short, these facts and his innocence have led to such a large fan following not only in India but throughout the world.
However, as the idiom goes, every coin has 2 sides. So does Salman khan has a negative side as well? This is with regards to the points:
Hit-and-run case
Relationship with Aishwarya Rai
Black Buck hunting case
Remarks about 26/11 attacks
I as a common person, don’t have any right to comment or speak on other person’s personal matter without any proofs, but these are the social controversies behind the STAR Salman Khan. But if these are true, than what was the need of the initiative of “BEING HUMAN”, of the number of charities he has been doing. Now, it will pop up in your mind that – well, a second chance can always be given. But my question here is, why should always a star be given a second chance, why not the common man. If a person commits a mistake, may he be a star or a common man, he should be punished. The case of hit-and-run was pending for last 13 years.
Session court has declared result for the ‘Hit-And-Run’ case yesterday and Salman has been found guilty for the same. It’s a good news for the victims however a bad one for Salman’s fans and even for those who had been lucky to get presents from Salman (either as money or a break in some movie or other help). Helping others cannot undo a wrong act. People need to know that law ought to take its own course and the actor needs to accept it. When a celebrity goes to jail everyone sympathizes.Mostly because everyone knows the celebrity & no one knows the victim."
Here are some of the tweets by Industry friends of Salman.
Nothing else to say..Except stay strong @BeingSalmanKhan ..like u always have.- Sania Mirza
The Kapoors are with the Khans in their difficult time. Time is the biggest healer. God Bless!- Rishi Kapoor
@BeingSalmanKhan is the nicest human being in this business. Wish all our Prayers and love help him in this difficult time. Deeply saddened.- Bipasha BasuIt hurts when your own are punished, even if they are in the wrong. We love you and are standing by you- Alia Bhatt
It doesn't matter what anyone or any court says he doesn't deserve this at any level...will stand by @BeingSalmanKhan no matter what...- Arjun Kapoor
Hurts to think of what could happen. We will always be with you. Hope the judge sees the beauty of a human being that Salman Khan is.- Parineeti Chopra
Sometimes your personally attached to a person so reactions are emmotional he is family for me #IStandWithSalmanKhan- Varun Dhawan
Terrible news. Dnt knw wht to say except tht will stand by @BeingSalmanKhan no matter what. Hes a good man and no 1 can tk tht away frm him.- Sonakshi Sinha
*NOTE: The above given thoughts are solely mine, and it is not intended to hurt reader’s sentiments.
We accept post from guest author for this blog, just drop a mail to atul39.chavan@gmail.com . Format of mail should be :
Subject : Title Of Post.
Body : Post Body. and include detail about you at the end of the body.
The Land Acquisition Act of 2013 is a legal Act in India which allows the Government of India to acquire any land in the country. As per Constitution of India land belongs to some individual or group of individuals have legal rights to own the land. These individuals are free to use their land according to their will or to sale their land for monetary or other advantages. However, at times land is needed for some community purpose, like roads, canals, government offices,military camps, SEZ, etc. Government can acquire the individuals land.Land Acquisition literally means acquiring of land for some public purpose by government/government agency as authorized by the law from the individual landowner (s) after paying some compensation in lieu of losses occurred to land owner(s) due to surrendering of his/their land to the concerned government agency. Land acquisition is currently governed by the right to fair compensation and settlement act 2013 which comes in effect from January 2014 prior, to that it was governed by land acquisition act 1894.
Appropriate Government would mean the Central Government if the purpose for acquisition is for the Union and for other purpose it is the State Government. It is not necessary that all the acquisition has to be initiated by the government alone. Local authorities, societies registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860 and Co-Operative Societies established under the Co-operative Societies Act can also acquire the land for developmental activities through the government.
Land Acquisition Act of 2013
The 2013 Act focuses on providing not only compensation to the land owners, but also extend rehabilitation and resettlement benefits to livelihood looser from the land, which shall be in addition to the minimum compensation. The minimum compensation to be paid to the land owners is based on a multiple of market value and other factors laid down in the Act. The Act forbids or regulates land acquisition when such acquisition would include multi-crop irrigated area. The Act changed the norms for acquisition of land for use by private companies or in case of public-private partnerships, including compulsory approval of 80% of the landowners. The Act also introduced changes in the land acquisition process, including a compulsory social-impact study, which need to be conducted before an acquisition in made.
The new law, also has some serious shortcomings as regards its provisions for socioeconomic impact assessment and it has also bypassed the constitutional local self governments by not recognizing them as "appropriate governments" in matters of land acquisition.
The executive order , or ordinance tries to make it easier for industrial land the ordinance chips away a major obstacle to industrial investment the ordinance makes land acquisition much simpler from several provisions of current laws .
What does the ordinance of land acquisition means basically?
It make acquisition easier in five areas industrial corridors,social infrastructure such as education, rural infrastructure such as road,powers housing for poor, defense etc
Such project will not need consent of 80% of landowners as in requirement in other sectors.
Multi-crop irrigate land can be acquired for these purposes.
Mandatory provision of jobs for whose land is acquired for industry corridors
Reasons for ordinance; governments stand:
In past Indian industry and foreign companies have faced problems in acquiring land for projects. In 2013 Mittal, largest steel maker put down plan to build factory in Orissa.
The changes now introduced for PM Narendra Modi for "Make In India".
General Issues with Land Acquisition:
Displacement of people from their native places, leading to distress. Local markets, grass root businesses & micro economies disturbed. Unemployment issues due to above two factors.
Inappropriate compensation for farmlands.
Economic Imbalances in societies.
Agricultural land shrinks leading to farm shortages at places.
No benefits for livelihood losers who are usually far greater in number than the land owners.
Exploitation of poor people in name of acquisition.
Proliferation of Land mafia.
So What's New in New Bill Proposed by BJP Government?
The BJP government has now introduced amendments to this act, which have been opposed by all political parties, including their ally Shiv Sena in the Rajya Sabha. The BJP's argument has been that the UPA's land acquisition law makes it impractical to acquire land for any public purpose and endlessly delays infrastructure projects.
While the amendments were passed in the lower house of the Parliament where BJP enjoys a vast majority, it has been unable to pass this in the Rajya Sabha. Instead, it took recourse in an ordinance to pass the amendments to the bill in December 2014.
Why Are The Political Parties So Opposed To The Amendments?
The amended act does not require consent from 80 percent of the land owners, if the purpose is for five sectors — national security, defense, rural infrastructure (including electrification), industrial corridors and housing for the poor. Social Impact Assessment (SIA) is also not required for these projects, according to these new amendments. This would mean that only the land owner would be compensated, since the SIA, used to track how many people depend on the land, is now being done away with.
According to the Campaign for Survival and Dignity, a national platform of tribal and forest dwellers' organizations in ten States, the bill has far too many loopholes to swing it in favour of industrialists and private interests.
Even though 80 percent consent from land owners is required when the project does not fall into the five categories stated earlier, the group claimed that there were two easy ways to circumvent the rule. One was in cases when a private group had acquired part of the land, then the government could acquire the rest of the land and would not require consent from land owners.
Second, government could acquire land for their own purpose, "to hold and control", and then change their mind and hand it over to a private company. According to the organisation, under section 1A(1)(a) of the amended act, what mattered was the intent of the government at the time of acquisition, which could change afterwards.
The members from Congress, Left, Trinamool Congress, SP, BSP and JD-U have all opposed the government over provisions of the land ordinance calling it "anti-farmer" and aimed at "benefitting corporates".
What Does The BJP Have To Say?
BJP has completely denied allegations that the amended act is anti-poor and anti-farmer.
"Opposition parties like Congress, Trinamool, Samajwadi Party and BSP have been carrying out a relentless campaign to create an impression that the ordinance is anti-farmer. We want to make it clear that contrary to their claims, the provisions in the ordinance will provide huge long-term benefits to the farmers of the country," BJP national secretary Siddharth Nath Singh has said.
The have also claimed that it is a "pro-farmer" bill as it has included 13 so far excluded Acts under the Land Acquisition Act, and land acquired from these existing central pieces of legislation will also require the same form of rehabilitation and compensation.
Post By: Abhishek Gattani - Trainee Engineer T&ES Jade Global Software Pvt Ltd.
If anyone is interested to post their thought on this blog, just drop a mail to atul39.chavan@gmail.com . Format of mail should be :
Subject : Title Of Post.
Body : Post Body. and include detail about you at the end of the body.
Symbolically, “where’s the beef?” is a challenge or claim indicating that an Idea is without sufficient substance. Exactly similar is the situation in Maharashtra where a ban on beef has been enforced. While there are stringent law, legitimate provisions for restricting cow slaughter houses are very common: 26 states in India have laws which regulate slaughter houses.
By irony, India is largest exporter of beef worldwide following Brazil The government of Maharashtra has brought amendment to protects animal right in state. It will affect life of millions of people in state. People at both end of spectrum those who consume and those who trade will Butchered by decision of government.
The slaughter of cows was prohibited in state under Maharashtra act of 1976. However passage of above animal will impose ban on bullocks which was given a green certificate. On contrary to that above provision will allow slaughter of water buffaloes, which provide car beef-generally of mediocre quality. Maharashtra has Asia’s largest abattoir. Some of the implications of the ban are:
The beef lovers have to make changes in their food habits.
The multi cuisine hotels serving foreign have to change their major Items in the menu. It may affect their business and directly revenue.
It has led to shutting of major beef producing factories & slaughter Houses and many have gone out of business.
It is also likely to surge the cost of other types of meat, as Demand reaches up.
More than "One Crore Maharashtrians" are rendered without a source Of livelihood.
The worst hits are Qureshi caste in Maharashtra, which largely Work as butchers and is there daily livelihood.
It will affect the leather industry and there business sales is likely to dip.
Hence, the cow here seems to be just 'Political Funda' with which to attack the minority & age-old communal stereotype of associating Muslims with beef consumption. It is more of political issue than an issue of faith. Cow protection sentiments are exploited by the state and politicians to mobilize people and catch votes, targeting poor 'Muslims' and 'Dalits' by accusing them of cow slaughter.
Post By: Abhishek Gattani - Trainee Engineer T&ES Jade Global Software Pvt Ltd.
If anyone is interested to post their thought on this blog, just drop a mail to atul39.chavan@gmail.com . Format of mail should be :
Subject : Title Of Post.
Body : Post Body. and include detail about you at the end of the body.